FoundationalPrimary paper2003
- ID
- hep-th/0301240
Why this source is here — The construction the entire de Sitter debate is organized around. Cited wherever the atlas describes what KKLT proposes.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
FoundationalPrimary paper2005
- ID
- hep-th/0502058
Why this source is here — The founding Large Volume Scenario paper, cited for the large-volume stabilization mechanism itself.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
FoundationalPrimary paper1985
Dine-Seiberg — the 1985 weak-coupling/large-volume observation
- Journal
- Phys. Lett. B 162 (1985) 299
Why this source is here — The original observation that string compactifications are controlled only asymptotically, which frames why any stabilized minimum is contested.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it. Year taken from the journal reference.
VerifiedPrimary paper2014
- Authors
- Michel et al.
- ID
- arXiv:1412.5702
Why this source is here — Cited on the defenders’ side of the anti-brane dispute, for the brane-dynamics argument that the singularity is resolved.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2019
- Authors
- Kallosh, Linde, McDonough, Scalisi
- ID
- arXiv:1901.02022
Why this source is here — A defence of KKLT against swampland objections, cited so the defenders’ strongest argument is represented in its own words.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2019
- Authors
- Kachru, Kim, McAllister, Zimet
- ID
- arXiv:1908.04788
Why this source is here — The explicit ten-dimensional analysis defenders cite as reproducing the four-dimensional uplift result.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2012
- Authors
- Bena et al.
- ID
- arXiv:1206.6369
Why this source is here — The sharpest statement of the anti-brane singularity objection, cited on the skeptics’ side of the same dispute.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2017
- Authors
- Moritz, Retolaza, Westphal
- ID
- arXiv:1707.08678
Why this source is here — A ten-dimensional treatment arguing the integrated equations obstruct the uplift.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2018
- Authors
- Danielsson, Van Riet
- ID
- arXiv:1804.01120
Why this source is here — A prominent statement of the position that string theory may have no de Sitter vacua at all, cited for the shape of the skeptical case.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2017
- Authors
- Gallego, Marsh, Vercnocke, Wrase
- ID
- arXiv:1707.01095
Why this source is here — An LVS de Sitter construction cited on the proponents’ side of the Large Volume Scenario question.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2012
- Authors
- Cicoli, Maharana, Quevedo, Burgess
- ID
- arXiv:1203.1750
- Journal
- JHEP 06 (2012) 011
Why this source is here — An LVS uplift route that avoids anti-branes, cited to show the proponents’ case does not rest on the KKLT mechanism.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2022
- Authors
- Junghans
- ID
- arXiv:2201.03572
Why this source is here — The control objection to LVS de Sitter vacua, cited on the skeptics’ side.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2022
- Authors
- Gao, Hebecker, Schreyer, Venken
- ID
- arXiv:2202.04087
- Journal
- JHEP 07 (2022) 056
Why this source is here — The parametric tadpole constraint, cited as the sharpest quantitative form of the LVS control objection.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2018
- Authors
- Obied, Ooguri, Spodyneiko, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:1806.08362
Why this source is here — The paper that introduced the de Sitter swampland conjecture. Cited wherever the atlas states the conjecture.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedPrimary paper2018
- Authors
- Ooguri, Palti, Shiu, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:1810.05506
Why this source is here — The refined form of the conjecture, cited for the Hessian condition that replaced the strict gradient bound.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedPrimary paper2018
- Authors
- Garg, Krishnan
- ID
- arXiv:1807.05193
Why this source is here — The slow-roll bound cited among the arguments motivating the conjecture.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedObservational or experimental result2018
- Authors
- Akrami, Kallosh, Linde, Vardanyan
- ID
- arXiv:1808.09440
Why this source is here — The cosmological critique of the conjecture, cited so the landscape side of the objection is represented.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedPrimary paper2022
- Authors
- Montero, Vafa, Valenzuela
- ID
- arXiv:2205.12293
Why this source is here — The paper proposing the Dark Dimension scenario, cited wherever the atlas describes it.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2022
- Authors
- Blumenhagen, Brinkmann, Makridou
- ID
- arXiv:2208.01057
Why this source is here — A string-theoretic realization of the Dark Dimension, cited to show the scenario has been embedded in a construction.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedObservational or experimental result2023
- Authors
- Law-Smith, Obied, Prabhu, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:2307.11048
- Journal
- JHEP 06 (2024) 047
Why this source is here — Astrophysical constraints bearing on the Dark Dimension’s dark-matter interpretation.
View source record →VerifiedObservational or experimental result2020
- Authors
- Lee, Adelberger, Cook, Fleischer, Heckel
- ID
- arXiv:2002.11761
- Journal
- PRL 124, 101101 (2020)
Why this source is here — The torsion-balance measurement that sets the current short-range gravity bound. One of the few genuinely settled empirical inputs on this map.
View source record →VerifiedObservational or experimental result2006
- Authors
- Kapner, Cook, Adelberger, Gundlach, Heckel, Hoyle, Swanson
- ID
- hep-ph/0611184
- Journal
- PRL 98, 021101 (2007)
Why this source is here — The earlier Eot-Wash inverse-square-law test, cited alongside the 2020 result for the experimental record.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2018
- Authors
- Agrawal, Obied, Steinhardt, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:1806.09718
Why this source is here — The paper drawing out what the conjectures imply for cosmology, cited as the origin of the quintessence branch of the debate.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedObservational or experimental result2018
- Authors
- Heisenberg, Bartelmann, Brandenberger, Refregier
- ID
- arXiv:1808.02877
Why this source is here — Equation-of-state bounds constraining swampland quintessence, cited wherever the atlas refers to w near minus one.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedObservational or experimental result2023
- Authors
- Schöneberg, Vacher, Dias, Carvalho, Martins
- ID
- arXiv:2307.15060
- Journal
- JCAP 2023(10), 039; doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/039
Why this source is here — A data-side reassessment that runs against the expected direction, finding newer data allows slightly more freedom in the criteria. Cited so the atlas does not present the observational trend as one-way.
View source record →VerifiedPrimary paper2019
- Authors
- Lüst, Palti, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:1906.05225
Why this source is here — The AdS distance conjecture, cited as the premise the Dark Dimension scenario is built on.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
VerifiedPrimary paper2019
- Authors
- Bedroya, Vafa
- ID
- arXiv:1909.11063
Why this source is here — The founding Trans-Planckian Censorship paper, cited wherever the atlas states the lifetime bound.
View source record →Title not recorded in the source map; named here as the source map names it.
ContextualEducational context2026
- Authors
- Rajan, Mayone Maha (architect and curator)
- Journal
- Maha Strategies Research; Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21603961
Why this source is here — The working paper this atlas is derived from. Cited where a claim rests on the paper’s own framing of the field rather than on a physics result — most directly the statement that no consensus exists.
View source record →Year taken from the publication date.