Direct answer
That a benchmark result holds for the conditions it was measured under, and that limits on generalising beyond those conditions are themselves to be documented.
Answer contract
Apply the relationships lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — MEASURE 2.3 and 2.5 — measurement under deployment-like conditions; limits of generalisability.. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:benchmark-design
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
Questions this page can answer
What does NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1 state about benchmark-design?
That a benchmark result holds for the conditions it was measured under, and that limits on generalising beyond those conditions are themselves to be documented.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, MEASURE 2.3 and 2.5 — measurement under deployment-like conditions; limits of generalisability.
What does this source explicitly not establish about benchmark-design?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:benchmark-design governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.