Direct answer
That errors serious enough to invalidate results and conclusions may require retraction, and that retraction with republication may be considered where honest error changes results but the underlying science appears valid.
Answer contract
Apply the relationships lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — §III.A, paragraph beginning "Errors serious enough to invalidate a paper’s results".. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:correction
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
Questions this page can answer
What does ICMJE Recommendations, §III.A Corrections and Version Control state about correction?
That errors serious enough to invalidate results and conclusions may require retraction, and that retraction with republication may be considered where honest error changes results but the underlying science appears valid.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, §III.A, paragraph beginning "Errors serious enough to invalidate a paper’s results".
What does this source explicitly not establish about correction?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:correction governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.