Direct answer
That a repository may hold a version of a work distinct from the publisher’s, and that the distinction between them is a matter of which edits are included.
Answer contract
Apply the machine record lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
Inspected source 1 — Section "What is the Author Manuscript?" — first paragraph.. Supports: The bounded scope recorded in the reviewed specification.
What the evidence does not establish
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Rights and reuse
Rights basis recorded in the reviewed specification; link and bounded original paraphrase only.
Dependencies and related concepts
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:repository-copy
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance
evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
Questions this page can answer
What does PubMed Central, Author Manuscripts in PMC state about repository-copy?
That a repository may hold a version of a work distinct from the publisher’s, and that the distinction between them is a matter of which edits are included.
Which exact locator in that source supports the claim on this page?
Inspected source 1, Section "What is the Author Manuscript?" — first paragraph.
What does this source explicitly not establish about repository-copy?
A specification is not a route, a release, or a public page.
Which canonical definition does this route depend on, and where is it owned?
applies-to: urn:maha:concept:evidence:repository-copy governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:evidence
What would have to be inspected before this page could claim more than it does?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.