de Sitter Vacua from Ten Dimensions ↗
- Authors
- Kachru, Kim, McAllister, Zimet
- ID
- arXiv:1908.04788
Why this source is here — The explicit ten-dimensional analysis defenders cite as reproducing the four-dimensional uplift result.
Claim ds-004 · Atlas v1.2.0
Whether the KKLT anti-brane uplift is under parametric ten-dimensional supergravity control is actively debated.
Last reviewed 2026-07-27 · Atlas v1.2.0
← Back to the ledgerWhy this source is here — The explicit ten-dimensional analysis defenders cite as reproducing the four-dimensional uplift result.
Why this source is here — A defence of KKLT against swampland objections, cited so the defenders’ strongest argument is represented in its own words.
Why this source is here — The sharpest statement of the anti-brane singularity objection, cited on the skeptics’ side of the same dispute.
Why this source is here — A ten-dimensional treatment arguing the integrated equations obstruct the uplift.
Why this source is here — A prominent statement of the position that string theory may have no de Sitter vacua at all, cited for the shape of the skeptical case.