Direct answer
Rights Basis, in this definition, is limited to the following inspected scope. Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Term boundaries and disambiguation
Use the term only for the source-backed scope stated here; keep adjacent concepts separate unless a typed relationship is explicit.
A useful definition states both inclusion and exclusion conditions so a machine answer cannot silently widen it.
Applied scope: Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources.
Definition and operating context
The canonical concept owner is maha-research. This route may apply evidence; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
This property may publish research objects, machine-readable provenance, reproduction protocols. It must not publish sales copy or unsupported interpretation.
Evidence and exact locators
Attribution 4.0 International Legal Code — Sections 2 and 3. Establishes: Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary.
Web Annotation Data Model — Section 3.3.6 Rights. Establishes: Recording rights information on annotation resources.
What the evidence does not establish
One work’s license does not grant rights in third-party material, trademarks, privacy, or patents.
Recording a rights URI is not proof that the asserted right is valid.
This route must not claim sales copy.
This route must not claim unsupported interpretation.
Related definitions and applications
localDefinition: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/definition
canonical-family-owner-definition-first: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/source-identity/definition
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/fixture
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/relationships
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/protocol
property-home: https://research.mahastrategies.com/
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/machine-record
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/method
Questions this page can answer
What does Rights Basis mean in this bounded context?
Rights Basis, in this definition, is limited to the following inspected scope. Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Which inspected sources establish the definition answer?
Attribution 4.0 International Legal Code (version 4.0), at Sections 2 and 3, supports licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Web Annotation Data Model (Recommendation, 23 February 2017), at Section 3.3.6 Rights, supports recording rights information on annotation resources.
What does the evidence not establish?
One work’s license does not grant rights in third-party material, trademarks, privacy, or patents. Recording a rights URI is not proof that the asserted right is valid. Property boundary: This route may apply evidence; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
Which canonical definition must be read first?
Read the maha-research definition at https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/source-identity/definition first. The present page applies that definition through its narrower route role.
What change would require this page to be revised or withdrawn?
Re-evaluate this page when a cited source, locator, governing instrument, local implementation, or canonical definition changes. Publication also requires a matching exact-revision review and active canonical release.