Direct answer
Rights Basis, in this relationship map, is limited to the following inspected scope. Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Relationship map
Name the relationship type and direction, then state what does not transfer across the edge.
A relationship does not make two concepts equivalent or transfer evidence, legal authority, or empirical validity.
Applied scope: Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources.
Definition and operating context
The canonical concept owner is maha-research. This route may apply evidence; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
This property may publish research objects, machine-readable provenance, reproduction protocols. It must not publish sales copy or unsupported interpretation.
Evidence and exact locators
Attribution 4.0 International Legal Code — Sections 2 and 3. Establishes: Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary.
Web Annotation Data Model — Section 3.3.6 Rights. Establishes: Recording rights information on annotation resources.
What the evidence does not establish
One work’s license does not grant rights in third-party material, trademarks, privacy, or patents.
Recording a rights URI is not proof that the asserted right is valid.
This route must not claim sales copy.
This route must not claim unsupported interpretation.
Related definitions and applications
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/definition
graphEdges: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/source-identity/definition
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/fixture
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/protocol
property-home: https://research.mahastrategies.com/
same-topic-application: https://research.mahastrategies.com/federation/research/rights-basis/machine-record
Questions this page can answer
What does Rights Basis mean in this bounded context?
Rights Basis, in this relationship map, is limited to the following inspected scope. Licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Recording rights information on annotation resources. The answer carries the source boundaries forward and does not infer authority from a neighboring topic.
Which inspected sources support this relationships answer?
Attribution 4.0 International Legal Code (version 4.0), at Sections 2 and 3, supports licensed rights, attribution conditions, retained notices, and no-endorsement boundary. Web Annotation Data Model (Recommendation, 23 February 2017), at Section 3.3.6 Rights, supports recording rights information on annotation resources.
What does the evidence not establish?
One work’s license does not grant rights in third-party material, trademarks, privacy, or patents. Recording a rights URI is not proof that the asserted right is valid. Property boundary: This route may apply evidence; it cannot redefine or inherit the authority of its canonical owner.
Which definition or canonical owner must be read first?
This page is the local maha-research definition for its topic. Related applications may depend on it but may not silently redefine it.
What source, policy, implementation, or release change would require revision?
Re-evaluate this page when a cited source, locator, governing instrument, local implementation, or canonical definition changes. Publication also requires a matching exact-revision review and active canonical release.